WASHINGTON \u2014 President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy compromised on bitterly contested disputes over federal spending and assistance for the poor as part of their debt-limit deal. They must now sell the deal to lawmakers from both parties. <\/p>\n
Here\u2019s a look at the most contentious and economically consequential provisions of the agreement they unveiled on Saturday, just days before the Treasury is projected to run out of cash on June 5.<\/p>\n
\u2014Debt-Limit Suspension<\/p>\n
The deal suspends the debt ceiling, effectively giving Treasury unfettered borrowing authority through January 2025 before another debt-ceiling increase would need congressional approval. That would be a win for Democrats \u2014 especially Biden, who wouldn\u2019t have to face another debt-limit battle before seeking reelection next year. <\/p>\n
\u2014Discretionary Spending<\/p>\n
The negotiators agreed to keep non-defense spending roughly flat next year and increase it by just 1% in 2025, one person familiar with the deal said. The deal puts limits on what\u2019s known as discretionary spending, the money Congress appropriates each year to fund federal agencies and programs. The restrictions don\u2019t apply to mandatory programs like Medicare and Social Security.<\/p>\n
Defense spending would rise next year by 3.3%, as Biden requested in his proposed budget. That is below the rate of inflation so it doesn\u2019t meet Republican defense hawks\u2019 aspirations for a military build-up. But it is a break from the 2011 debt-limit deal, in which spending caps were equitably applied to defense and non-defense spending.<\/p>\n
The deal means that many federal programs will face budget cuts next year since there will be no increase to account for inflation. Congress always has the authority to approve more spending in case of an unexpected event, such as a war or pandemic.<\/p>\n
\u2014Work Requirements<\/p>\n
The deal calls for a phased-in expansion of work requirements to apply to older recipients of food stamps, formally known as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Work requirements for food assistance would eventually apply up to age 54, instead of age 49, as current law requires.<\/p>\n
The White House says it scored a win by gaining exceptions for veterans and vulnerable groups such as homeless people. And the administration also claims as a win a provision that would end the tougher work requirements in 2030 without additional action by Congress.<\/p>\n
But the stricter work standards are a win for Republicans, who pushed for additional work rules for adults seeking anti-poverty assistance. They say this would save money by reducing the number of people who receive benefits from those programs.<\/p>\n
However, this portion of the deal is likely to cause some progressive Democrats, who don\u2019t want to kick low-income Americans off social programs, to oppose the deal.<\/p>\n
\u2014Energy Permitting<\/p>\n
A broad plan to speed up energy project approvals has largely been scrapped from the accord, a win for progressives who opposed major changes to a bedrock environmental law, according to a Democratic aide familiar with the matter. Fossil fuel companies and their Republican supporters gained only minor tweaks to streamline environmental reviews, such as designating a sole lead agency to shepherd a single impact review, the aide said.<\/p>\n
But the agreement doesn\u2019t curtail the scope of the 53-year-old National Environmental Policy Act, which requires environmental reviews for energy projects, or reduce the time available for opponents to challenge project approvals. Still, some of the permitting issues are being negotiated as the agreement gets written into legislation, according to a second person familiar with the talks.<\/p>\n
(Laura Davison contributed to this report.)<\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n