WASHINGTON \u2014 Lawmakers averted a partial government shutdown Thursday after the Senate cleared a two-step continuing resolution to allow final appropriations work to wrap up in the coming weeks.<\/p>\n
The Senate voted 77-13 to send the short-term spending measure to President Joe Biden\u2019s desk. The House earlier Thursday passed the bill on a 320-99 vote under the suspension of the rules, which requires a two-thirds majority of lawmakers present and voting.<\/p>\n
If Congress hadn\u2019t acted, spending authority for agencies covered by a subset of the 12 annual appropriations bills would have lapsed March 2.<\/p>\n
The vote will set up a first tranche of full-year spending bills that the House is expected to vote on next Wednesday: the Agriculture, Commerce-Justice-Science, Energy-Water, Interior-Environment, Military Construction-VA and Transportation-HUD measures. Enactment of the bills will fund those agencies through Sept. 30.<\/p>\n
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Thursday that legislative text of that package would be released over the weekend. Text is expected to be released Sunday, which would set up a Wednesday vote in the House under the chamber\u2019s 72-hour rule to give lawmakers sufficient time to consider the package.<\/p>\n
The final contents of the bills are not yet clear, though it appears that the bills will not feature the big conservative policy wins House Republicans were pushing for. Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer said Thursday that the package would not include \u201cunacceptable poison-pill riders that we said would not fly.\u201d<\/p>\n
Still, Republicans are expected to claim credit for wins in the packages even if they aren\u2019t the most high-profile, culture war-related items that received most of the attention over the summer when the House was debating the bills.<\/p>\n
\u201cIf you\u2019re expecting a lot of home runs and grand slams here, I admit you\u2019ll be disappointed. But we will be able to secure a number of policy victories,\u201d Johnson told members on a conference call Friday, according to a source familiar with his comments. \u201cThese bills will be littered with singles and doubles that we should be proud of, especially in our small majority.\u201d<\/p>\n
House Interior-Environment Appropriations Chair Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, said there were \u201cnot a lot\u201d of riders in his bill, as many that House Republicans pushed for got dropped.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe Democrats were never going to agree to a lot of those things,\u201d he said. \u201cBut I think we got some good provisions. So did the Democrats, frankly. That\u2019s kind of the nature of a compromise.\u201d<\/p>\n
The second batch of bills will be considered by the March 22 deadline to avoid a partial government shutdown, lawmakers have said. That package includes the Defense, Financial Services, Legislative Branch, Homeland Security, Labor-HHS-Education and State-Foreign Operations measures. <\/p>\n
Sources are split on how close lawmakers are to reaching a deal on the second package. One person close to the talks said they were \u201cclose\u201d and could be done \u201cwell in advance\u201d of March 22.<\/p>\n
Others were less optimistic about how near they actually are to finalizing that package, which includes the most controversial measures. Lawmakers are continuing to negotiate open issues, sources said.<\/p>\n
House Financial Services Appropriations Chairman Steve Womack, R-Ark., said lawmakers are still negotiating his bill. He said while there is optimism about the first package of bills set to hit the floor next week, the trickier bills, including his, are in the second batch due March 22.<\/p>\n
\u201cThat\u2019s like an eternity here, right?\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
Democrats did \u201cvery, very well\u201d in their fight against Republican riders in the first package, House Appropriations ranking member Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., said Thursday, with no \u201cpoison pills.\u201d She said some in the second group are still being worked out.<\/p>\n
For example, Homeland Security appropriations remain unfinished. Senate Homeland Security Appropriations Chair Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn., said that Republicans had not yet dropped their demands for controversial policy riders in his bill, which funds immigration and border enforcement agencies.<\/p>\n
\u201cRepublicans are going to have to give up their riders, this is a budget bill, this is not a policy bill,\u201d he said. \u201cThese riders can\u2019t pass, they know they can\u2019t pass. It\u2019s going to be up to Republicans, whether they want to shut down the government or not.\u201d<\/p>\n
Immigration policy became a flash point during House floor debate on the stopgap measure Thursday. Members of the hard-line Freedom Caucus and others repeatedly brought up the recent murder of 22-year-old Laken Riley in Athens, Ga., by a Venezuelan man who crossed into the U.S. illegally, and was released temporarily into the country.<\/p>\n
Critics of the appropriations process also brought up continuation of current spending levels while U.S. debt continues to rise rapidly.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll we seem to offer is low energy and low [testosterone] in the face of these mounting challenges,\u201d Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., said.<\/p>\n
Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., argued that forcing a shutdown would damage national security including nuclear weapons programs at the Energy Department, and would only hurt constituents in GOP as well as Democratic districts.<\/p>\n
\u201cGovernment shutdowns, and I have lived through three, never work. They do more harm than good,\u201d said Fleischmann, chairman of the House Energy-Water Appropriations Subcommittee. \u201cI do respect my friends who are very passionate today in opposing this. But the reality is the American people want us to do our work, and to do our work well. We\u2019ve got to keep the government open.\u201d<\/p>\n
In the end, Johnson received a \u201cmajority of the majority\u201d on the stopgap vote: 113 Republicans voted for it, with 97 against.<\/p>\n
Hours later across the Capitol, senators made relatively short work of the package.<\/p>\n
However, Schumer, D-N.Y., had to navigate the usual demands from a few lawmakers seeking to extract concessions in exchange for dropping objections to swift passage.<\/p>\n
One \u201chold\u201d on the measure came from Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., who sought a vote to extend current funding levels through Sept. 30, which would have triggered across-the-board cuts under last year\u2019s debt limit law. His \u201cmotion to commit\u201d the bill to committee to make those changes was rejected, 14-76.<\/p>\n
A similar proposal from Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, but without the Israel aid, was also rejected by a large majority of the chamber, 12-77. A separate motion from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to send the bill to committee for addition of House-passed border security legislation, was defeated, 32-58.<\/p>\n
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., won a vote on his amendment to bar Congress from setting up programs allowing the Federal Reserve to purchase and sell municipal debt, similar to what was authorized during the pandemic. Senators voted it down, 37-53.<\/p>\n
Separately, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., wanted a stand-alone vote next week on a measure to reauthorize and expand the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, which expires later this year.<\/p>\n
Hawley wants to expand the law\u2019s coverage to more states, such as victims of the first atomic bomb test in Trinity, N.M., and to his own constituents in St. Louis, where uranium used in the Manhattan Project contaminated the surrounding area. Under the agreement, Schumer said a vote on Hawley\u2019s bill would be held no later than March 8.<\/p>\n
The six-page continuing resolution is mostly very simple: It extends the deadline to March 8 for four of the bills that were operating with a deadline of this Friday. For the rest of the bills that already had a March 8 deadline, the measure would extend that date to March 22.<\/p>\n
Then there are the five pages of surprise new language added Wednesday in response to a problem that arose just a day earlier.<\/p>\n
It includes a provision that would block the Education Department\u2019s Tuesday decision that Republicans say could have expanded Pell Grant eligibility for roughly 280,000 college students in the upcoming academic year. Democrats support the change as well because Pell Grants weren\u2019t intended to benefit students in families with slightly higher incomes, and if left in place would cause major strains on discretionary programs in future years.<\/p>\n
The CR fix is estimated to save $3.4 billion over a decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office, with the money put back into the Pell Grant program starting in fiscal 2025 to alleviate a looming Pell shortfall that appropriators would have otherwise had to make up.<\/p>\n
However, it doesn\u2019t have universal support, as some lawmakers are worried the provision would go too far and cause students who are currently eligible for Pell to lose their assistance.<\/p>\n
\u201cI am very disappointed that 100,000 students are not going to be eligible for Pell Grants, and that\u2019s something I hope to address as soon as possible,\u201d Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said Thursday. He said he would try to address the issue in final spending bills.<\/p>\n
House Education and the Workforce ranking member Bobby Scott also expressed his opposition to the Pell provision, even though he voted for the CR on Thursday.<\/p>\n
\u201cAt a time when college has become increasingly unaffordable, we should be doing all we can to help students succeed,\u201d Scott, D-Va., said in a statement. \u201cI am extremely disappointed in this outcome, and I will continue to fight for expanded access to the Pell Grant in the future.\u201d<\/p>\n
____<\/p>\n
(Peter Cohn, Olivia Bridges and Caitlin Reilly contributed to this report.) <\/p>\n
___<\/p>\n